↓ Skip to main content

Tooth Replacement in Late Jurassic Dryolestidae (Eupantotheria, Mammalia)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mammalian Evolution, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Tooth Replacement in Late Jurassic Dryolestidae (Eupantotheria, Mammalia)
Published in
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, March 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1027300726126
Authors

Thomas Martin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Ukraine 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 38%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Professor 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 24%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#289
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,458
of 29,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them