↓ Skip to main content

Micronematobotrys, a new genus and its phylogenetic placement based on rDNA sequence analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Mycological Progress, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Micronematobotrys, a new genus and its phylogenetic placement based on rDNA sequence analyses
Published in
Mycological Progress, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11557-010-0664-7
Authors

Xiang Sun, Liang-Dong Guo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 18%
Researcher 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 77%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Mycological Progress
#169
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,512
of 93,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycological Progress
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.