↓ Skip to main content

Fine-tuning implications for complementary dark matter and LHC SUSY searches

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Fine-tuning implications for complementary dark matter and LHC SUSY searches
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/jhep05(2011)120
Authors

S. Cassel, D. M. Ghilencea, S. Kraml, A. Lessa, G. G. Ross

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 8%
Canada 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 38%
Researcher 5 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 92%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#3,232
of 24,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,903
of 123,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#20
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.