↓ Skip to main content

Role of the Microbiome in Food Allergy

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Role of the Microbiome in Food Allergy
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11882-018-0780-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hsi-en Ho, Supinda Bunyavanich

Abstract

Resident microbial communities likely modify risk for allergic disorders, including food allergy. We review epidemiologic studies linking microbial exposures to food allergy risk and discuss the mechanisms by which the microbiome may modulate oral tolerance. We additionally address ongoing translational efforts in human microbiome studies. Epidemiologic studies and murine models support that altered microbial exposures and colonization in early life modify food allergy risk. Differential microbiota confer protection or susceptibility to food allergy by modulating the regulatory tone of the mucosal immune system. Recent efforts are focused on the identification of bacterial strains necessary for oral tolerance in human and microbial-based clinical trials. Early childhood appears to be critical for the colonization of a diverse microbiota necessary for the induction and maintenance of oral tolerance. Identification and functional evaluation of protective commensal microbes will inform strategies for the prevention and treatment of food allergy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 48 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 46 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,470,361
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#97
of 860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,606
of 343,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.