↓ Skip to main content

Nivolumab-induced acute granulomatous tubulointerstitial nephritis in a patient with gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Investigational New Drugs, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Nivolumab-induced acute granulomatous tubulointerstitial nephritis in a patient with gastric cancer
Published in
Investigational New Drugs, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10637-018-0596-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshihisa Nakatani, Hisato Kawakami, Masashi Ichikawa, Sachiyo Yamamoto, Yasuo Otsuka, Akiko Mashiko, Yasutoshi Takashima, Akihiko Ito, Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Shuji Arima

Abstract

We here report a case of nivolumab-induced acute granulomatous tubulointerstitial nephritis in a patient with gastric cancer. A 68-year-old woman with recurrent gastric cancer developed acute kidney injury associated with kidney enlargement and urinary leukocytes after 38 cycles of nivolumab treatment. A diagnosis of acute granulomatous tubulointerstitial nephritis was made based on kidney biopsy findings. Immunohistochemistry revealed expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in degenerated epithelial cells of collecting tubules. Among infiltrating immune cells, aggregation of T cells was more extensive than that of B cells, with CD4+T cells outnumbering CD8+T cells, consistent with the relative numbers of these cells in the circulation. Treatment with methylprednisolone (1.0 mg/kg daily) led to a rapid improvement in renal function and reduction in the number of circulating CD4+T cells. Prompt administration of high-dose corticosteroid is thus recommended after diagnosis of this adverse event of nivolumab treatment by kidney biopsy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 59%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Psychology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,504,780
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Investigational New Drugs
#772
of 1,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,164
of 329,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigational New Drugs
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.