| Title |
Spatial scale and the cost of density-dependent habitat selection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Ecology, October 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02071560 |
| Authors |
Douglas W. Morris |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Ecology
#291
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,498
of 12,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them