↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of zinc transporters by dietary flaxseed lignan in human breast cancer xenografts

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology Reports, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Regulation of zinc transporters by dietary flaxseed lignan in human breast cancer xenografts
Published in
Molecular Biology Reports, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11033-007-9129-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lian-ying Zhang, Xiao-lei Wang, Dao-xu Sun, Xian-xi Liu, Xiao-yan Hu, Feng Kong

Abstract

Zinc is essential for cell growth. Previous studies have shown that zinc concentration in breast cancer tissues is higher than that in normal breast tissues. Zinc cannot passively diffuse across cell membranes and specific zinc transporter proteins are required. Two gene families have been identified involved in zinc homeostasis. ZnT transporters reduce intracellular zinc while ZIP transporters increase intracellular zinc. In this study, three human zinc transporter members: ZnT-1, ZIP2 and LIV-1 were chosen. We aimed to determine the effect of flaxseed lignan on the growth of ER-negative breast cancer cells in a nude mice model and observe the effect of flaxseed lignan on the regulation of the three zinc transporter in mRNA level. Nude mice were xenografted with human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 and 6 weeks later were fed either the basal diet (BD) or BD supplemented with 10% FS and SDG for 5 weeks. The SDG levels were equivalent to the amounts in the 10% FS. RT-PCR was performed. Compared with the BD group, the tumor growth rate was significantly lower (P < 0. 05) in the FS and SDG group. ZnT-1 mRNA level in mammary tumor was increased in SDG group and decreased in FS group, but no significant difference was found. Extremely low amplification of ZIP2 from mRNA was detected, with no difference between the treatment groups. LIV-1 mRNA expression of SDG group increases compared with BD group. In FS group, it significantly increases nearly 9 times than that in BD group (P < 0. 005).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology Reports
#389
of 2,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,874
of 70,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology Reports
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,907 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them