↓ Skip to main content

Colorectal Cancer in the Young

Overview of attention for article published in Current Gastroenterology Reports, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 368)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Colorectal Cancer in the Young
Published in
Current Gastroenterology Reports, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11894-018-0618-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Swati G. Patel, Dennis J. Ahnen

Abstract

Colorectal cancer incidence has been rapidly rising in those under the age of 50 over the last 20 years. This paper will review the epidemiology, clinicopathologic, molecular features, proposed risk factors, and prevention/treatment approach for early onset CRC (EOCRC) patients. EOCRC appears to have a different spectrum of clinical, pathologic, and molecular presentation compared to CRC diagnosed in older individuals. EOCRCs are disproportionately located in the distal colon; these patients tend to present with symptoms, and there is a longer interval between symptoms and diagnosis. There may be a distinct molecular signature, including progression through the microsatellite and chromosomal stable (MACS) pathway and LINE-1 hypomethylation for a subset of EOCRCs. The majority of EOCRCs are sporadic without clear risk factors that would have made the patient eligible for earlier screening. There is an acute need for educational efforts aimed at both providers and patients to raise awareness about CRC in the young. Improving adherence to screening in young patients eligible for screening and emphasizing early evaluation of symptoms are important steps to decreasing the burden of CRC in younger patients. Modeling and empiric data are needed to determine whether our current screening approach should be modified and whether causation and treatment options may be different in a molecular subset EOCRCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 20%
Student > Master 20 11%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 56 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 62 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#565,642
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#8
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,893
of 344,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them