↓ Skip to main content

Leitfaden „Digitale Pathologie in der Diagnostik“

Overview of attention for article published in Die Pathologie, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Leitfaden „Digitale Pathologie in der Diagnostik“
Published in
Die Pathologie, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00292-018-0433-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Haroske, R. Zwönitzer, P. Hufnagl, Kommission Digitale Pathologie

Abstract

The digitization of medicine is gaining momentum in pathology. Long-known technologies have reached such a degree of maturity that their use in primary diagnostics in routine pathology will be possible. In spite of the complexity of technological solutions and the far-reaching consequences in terms of diagnostic reliability, as well as due to the high investments, the decision for a specific product may become highly sophisticated for a pathologist. An implementation guide for Digital Diagnostics in Pathology is presented to describe technical and legal conditions for making this new technology feasible for the single pathologist. For more than two years, the Digital Pathology Commission of the Federal Association of German Pathologists developed and discussed this implementation guide for digital diagnostics, especially for the use of virtual microscopy in the daily pathology routine in Germany. The key is the principal comparability of diagnostic reliability between conventional stained microscopic slides and their digital images, which have to be shown by the potential user. In eight chapters, the validation procedure as well as technical minimum requirements in slide scanners, the visualization pipeline, archiving, and integration in the pathology workflow are described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Materials Science 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%