↓ Skip to main content

Variants in GATA4 are a rare cause of familial and sporadic congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Variants in GATA4 are a rare cause of familial and sporadic congenital diaphragmatic hernia
Published in
Human Genetics, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00439-012-1249-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lan Yu, Julia Wynn, Yee Him Cheung, Yufeng Shen, George B. Mychaliska, Timothy M. Crombleholme, Kenneth S. Azarow, Foong Yen Lim, Dai H. Chung, Douglas Potoka, Brad W. Warner, Brian Bucher, Charles Stolar, Gudrun Aspelund, Marc S. Arkovitz, Wendy K. Chung

Abstract

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is characterized by incomplete formation of the diaphragm occurring as either an isolated defect or in association with other anomalies. Genetic factors including aneuploidies and copy number variants are important in the pathogenesis of many cases of CDH, but few single genes have been definitively implicated in human CDH. In this study, we used whole exome sequencing (WES) to identify a paternally inherited novel missense GATA4 variant (c.754C>T; p.R252W) in a familial case of CDH with incomplete penetrance. Phenotypic characterization of the family included magnetic resonance imaging of the chest and abdomen demonstrating asymptomatic defects in the diaphragm in the two "unaffected" missense variant carriers. Screening 96 additional CDH patients identified a de novo heterozygous GATA4 variant (c.848G>A; p.R283H) in a non-isolated CDH patient. In summary, GATA4 is implicated in both familial and sporadic CDH, and our data suggests that WES may be a powerful tool to discover rare variants for CDH.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 17%
Computer Science 2 3%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#933
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,901
of 182,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.