You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chinese market responses to overexploitation of sharks and sea cucumbers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.018 |
| Authors |
Hampus Eriksson, Shelley Clarke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 19% |
| Australia | 8 | 10% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 4% |
| South Africa | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 78% |
| Scientists | 13 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 275 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 17% |
| Researcher | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 102 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 60 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 67 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2021.
All research outputs
#265,761
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#171
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,924
of 279,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#3
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.