↓ Skip to main content

On the relation between theory of mind and executive functioning: A developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
Title
On the relation between theory of mind and executive functioning: A developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2018
DOI 10.3758/s13423-018-1459-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Wade, Heather Prime, Jennifer M. Jenkins, Keith O. Yeates, Tricia Williams, Kang Lee

Abstract

Theory of mind (ToM) and executive functioning (EF) show marked interrelatedness across childhood, and developmental psychologists have long been interested in understanding the nature of this association. The present review addresses this issue from a cognitive neuroscience perspective by exploring three hypotheses regarding their functional overlap: (1) ToM relies on EF (EF→ToM); (2) EF relies on ToM (ToM→EF); and (3) ToM and EF are mutually related, owing to shared neural structures or networks (ToM↔EF). Drawing on evidence from normative brain development, neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases, patient lesion studies, and brain-imaging studies, we suggest that only a strict version of the ToM↔EF proposal of complete neural overlap can be confidently ruled out on the basis of existing evidence. The balance of evidence suggests that separable neurobiological mechanisms likely underlie ToM and EF, with shared mechanisms for domain-general processing that support both abilities. We highlight how future studies may empirically substantiate the nature of the ToM-EF relationship using various biobehavioral approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 240 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Researcher 15 6%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 72 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 103 43%
Neuroscience 25 10%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Sports and Recreations 3 1%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 81 34%