↓ Skip to main content

Resource availability affects individual niche variation and its consequences in group-living European badgers Meles meles

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Resource availability affects individual niche variation and its consequences in group-living European badgers Meles meles
Published in
Oecologia, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-3202-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Robertson, Robbie A. McDonald, Richard J. Delahay, Simon D. Kelly, Stuart Bearhop

Abstract

Although intra-population variation in niches is a widespread phenomenon with important implications for ecology, evolution and management of a range of animal species, the causes and consequences of this variation remain poorly understood. We used stable isotope analysis to characterise foraging niches and to investigate the causes and consequences of individual niche variation in the European badger, a mustelid mammal that lives in territorial social groups, but forages alone. We found that the degree of individual niche variation within social groups was negatively related to the availability of farmland habitats, which represent an important foraging habitat for badgers; and was positively related to territory size, supporting the idea that resource limitation and ecological opportunity lead to increased individual specialisation. We also found that the degree of individual specialisation related to an individual's body condition and that this effect varied with ecological context; such that specialisation had a stronger positive relationship with body condition in social groups with reduced availability of key farmland habitats. Body condition was also related to the utilisation of specific resources (woodland invertebrates), but again this relationship varied with the availability of farmland foraging habitats. This study supports the idea that resource availability plays an important role in determining patterns of individual niche variation, and identifies the potential adaptive consequences of specialised foraging strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 169 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 26%
Student > Master 39 22%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 27 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 51%
Environmental Science 32 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2016.
All research outputs
#5,880,328
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,244
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,671
of 352,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#14
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.