| Title |
Diagnosis of central hypovolemia by using passive leg raising
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-007-0642-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julien Maizel, Norair Airapetian, Emmanuel Lorne, Christophe Tribouilloy, Ziad Massy, Michel Slama |
| Abstract |
Suspected central hypovolemia is a frequent clinical situation in hospitalized patients, and no simple bedside diagnostic test in spontaneously breathing patients is available. We tested the value of passive leg raising to predict hemodynamic improvement after fluid expansion in patients with suspected central hypovolemia. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 12% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 28% |
| Unknown | 32 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 66% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,696,673
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,263
of 4,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,355
of 71,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.