↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors of vertebral fractures in women with systemic lupus erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors of vertebral fractures in women with systemic lupus erythematosus
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10067-009-1105-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Mendoza-Pinto, Mario García-Carrasco, Hilda Sandoval-Cruz, Margarita Muñoz-Guarneros, Ricardo O. Escárcega, Mario Jiménez-Hernández, Pamela Munguía-Realpozo, Manuel Sandoval-Cruz, Margarita Delezé-Hinojosa, Aurelio López-Colombo, Ricard Cervera

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to analyze the role of traditional and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-related risk factors in the development of vertebral fractures. A cross-sectional study was performed in women with SLE attending a single center. A vertebral fracture was defined as a reduction of at least 20% of vertebral body height. Two hundred ten patients were studied, with median age of 43 years and median disease duration of 72 months. Osteopenia was present in 50.3% of patients and osteoporosis in 17.4%. At least one vertebral fracture was detected in 26.1%. Patients with vertebral fractures had a higher mean age (50 +/- 14 vs. 41 +/- 13.2 years, p = 0.001), disease damage (57.1% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.001), lower bone mineral density (BMD) at the total hip (0.902 +/- 0.160 vs. 982 +/- 0.137 g/cm(2), p = 0.002), and postmenopausal status (61.9% vs. 45.3%, p = 0.048). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that only age (p = 0.001) and low BMD at the total hip (p = 0.007) remained as significant factors for the presence of vertebral fracture. The high prevalence of vertebral fractures in the relatively young population implies that more attention must be paid to detect and treat vertebral fractures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Other 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 12 30%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,139
of 2,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,038
of 94,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.