↓ Skip to main content

Serial Monogamy as Polygyny or Polyandry?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Nature, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Serial Monogamy as Polygyny or Polyandry?
Published in
Human Nature, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12110-009-9060-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monique Borgerhoff Mulder

Abstract

Applications of sexual selection theory to humans lead us to expect that because of mammalian sex differences in obligate parental investment there will be gender differences in fitness variances, and males will benefit more than females from multiple mates. Recent theoretical work in behavioral ecology suggests reality is more complex. In this paper, focused on humans, predictions are derived from conventional parental investment theory regarding expected outcomes associated with serial monogamy and are tested with new data from a postreproductive cohort of men and women in a primarily horticultural population in western Tanzania (Pimbwe). Several predictions derived from the view that serial monogamy is a reproductive strategy from which males benefit are not supported. Furthermore, Pimbwe women are the primary beneficiaries of multiple marriages. The implications for applications of sexual selection theory to humans are discussed, in particular the fact that in some populations women lead sexual and reproductive lives that are very different from those derived from a simple Bateman-Trivers model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 105 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 28%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Professor 8 7%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 28%
Social Sciences 28 26%
Psychology 17 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,549,281
of 25,120,346 outputs
Outputs from Human Nature
#144
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,215
of 102,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Nature
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,120,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them