↓ Skip to main content

The ‘I’ and the ‘Me’ in self-referential awareness: a neurocognitive hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Processing, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 337)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The ‘I’ and the ‘Me’ in self-referential awareness: a neurocognitive hypothesis
Published in
Cognitive Processing, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10339-009-0336-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Tagini, Antonino Raffone

Abstract

The nature of the 'self' and self-referential awareness has been one of the most debated issues in philosophy, psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Understanding the neurocognitive bases of self-related representation and processing is also crucial to research on the neural correlates of consciousness. The distinction between an 'I', corresponding to a subjective sense of the self as a thinker and causal agent, and a 'Me', as the objective sense of the self with the unique and identifiable features constituting one's self-image or self-concept, suggested by William James, has been re-elaborated by authors from different theoretical perspectives. In this article, empirical studies and theories about the 'I' and the 'Me' in cognition and self-related awareness are reviewed, including the relationships between self and perception, self and memory, the development of the self, self-referential stimulus processing, as well as related neuroimaging studies. Subsequently, the relations between self and different aspects of consciousness are considered. On the basis of the reviewed literature and with reference to Block's distinction between phenomenal and access consciousness, a neurocognitive hypothesis is formulated about 'I'-related and 'Me'-related self-referential awareness. This hypothesis is extended to metacognitive awareness and a form of non-transitive consciousness, characteristic of meditation experiences and studies, with particular reference to the notion of mindfulness and other Buddhist constructs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Canada 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 199 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 17%
Student > Master 34 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 55 24%
Unknown 23 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 100 44%
Neuroscience 18 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 8%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 42 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,992,287
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Processing
#32
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,389
of 92,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Processing
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.