↓ Skip to main content

Superconductivity in the TiO and NbO systems

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Low Temperature Physics, May 1972
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Superconductivity in the TiO and NbO systems
Published in
Journal of Low Temperature Physics, May 1972
DOI 10.1007/bf00660068
Authors

J. K. Hulm, C. K. Jones, R. A. Hein, J. W. Gibson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 73 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 27%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 21 27%
Materials Science 20 26%
Chemistry 13 17%
Engineering 5 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,754,533
of 23,572,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Low Temperature Physics
#133
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#764
of 3,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Low Temperature Physics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them