| Title |
Evolution of gastropod mitochondrial genome arrangements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-8-61 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Grande, José Templado, Rafael Zardoya |
| Abstract |
Gastropod mitochondrial genomes exhibit an unusually great variety of gene orders compared to other metazoan mitochondrial genome such as e.g those of vertebrates. Hence, gastropod mitochondrial genomes constitute a good model system to study patterns, rates, and mechanisms of mitochondrial genome rearrangement. However, this kind of evolutionary comparative analysis requires a robust phylogenetic framework of the group under study, which has been elusive so far for gastropods in spite of the efforts carried out during the last two decades. Here, we report the complete nucleotide sequence of five mitochondrial genomes of gastropods (Pyramidella dolabrata, Ascobulla fragilis, Siphonaria pectinata, Onchidella celtica, and Myosotella myosotis), and we analyze them together with another ten complete mitochondrial genomes of gastropods currently available in molecular databases in order to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships among the main lineages of gastropods. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 6 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Uruguay | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 164 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 121 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,997
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,772
of 95,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#30
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.