| Title |
A thermodynamic interpretation of the size-ratio limits for laves phase formation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, May 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11661-999-0292-5 |
| Authors |
J. H. Zhu, C. T. Liu, L. M. Pike, P. K. Liaw |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 31 | 46% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#157
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,627
of 36,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them