↓ Skip to main content

The Semantic Web – ISWC 2010

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'The Semantic Web – ISWC 2010'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 I18n of Semantic Web Applications
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Social Dynamics in Conferences: Analyses of Data from the Live Social Semantics Application
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Using Semantic Web Technologies for Clinical Trial Recruitment
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Experience of Using OWL Ontologies for Automated Inference of Routine Pre-operative Screening Tests
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Enterprise Data Classification Using Semantic Web Technologies
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Semantic Techniques for Enabling Knowledge Reuse in Conceptual Modelling
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Semantic Technologies for Enterprise Cloud Management
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Semantic MediaWiki in Operation: Experiences with Building a Semantic Portal
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 A Case Study of Linked Enterprise Data
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Linkage of Heterogeneous Knowledge Resources within In-Store Dialogue Interaction
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 ISReal: An Open Platform for Semantic-Based 3D Simulations in the 3D Internet
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 ORE - A Tool for Repairing and Enriching Knowledge Bases
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Mapping Master: A Flexible Approach for Mapping Spreadsheets to OWL
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 dbrec — Music Recommendations Using DBpedia
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Knowledge Engineering for Historians on the Example of the Catalogus Professorum Lipsiensis
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Time-Oriented Question Answering from Clinical Narratives Using Semantic-Web Techniques
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Will Semantic Web Technologies Work for the Development of ICD-11?
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Using SPARQL to Test for Lattices: Application to Quality Assurance in Biomedical Ontologies
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Exploiting Relation Extraction for Ontology Alignment
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Towards Semantic Annotation Supported by Dependency Linguistics and ILP
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Towards Technology Structure Mining from Scientific Literature
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Auto-experimentation of KDD Workflows Based on Ontological Planning
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Customizing the Composition of Actions, Programs, and Web Services with User Preferences
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Adding Integrity Constraints to the Semantic Web for Instance Data Evaluation
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Abstract: The Open Graph Protocol Design Decisions
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Evaluating Search Engines by Clickthrough Data
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Abstract: Semantic Technology at The New York Times: Lessons Learned and Future Directions
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 What does It Look Like, Really? Imagining how Citizens might Effectively, Usefully and Easily Find, Explore, Query and Re-present Open/Linked Data
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2010
Published by
ADS, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-17749-1
ISBNs
978-3-64-217748-4, 978-3-64-217749-1
Editors

Patel-Schneider, Peter F., Pan, Yue, Hitzler, Pascal, Mika, Peter, Zhang, Lei, Pan, Jeff Z., Horrocks, Ian, Glimm, Birte, Patel-Schneider, Peter F., Pan, Yue, Hitzler, Pascal, Mika, Peter, Zhang, Lei, Pan, Jeff Z., Horrocks, Ian, Glimm, Birte

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 26 84%
Engineering 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,313
of 37,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,566
of 181,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#212
of 643 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 643 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.