You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
New information about Echinochiton dufoei, the Ordovician spiny chiton
|
---|---|
Published in |
American malacological bulletin, July 2008
|
DOI | 10.4003/0740-2783-25.1.25 |
Authors |
John Pojeta, Jimmie DuFoe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 54% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 69% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2009.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American malacological bulletin
#40
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,577
of 95,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American malacological bulletin
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them