↓ Skip to main content

Measurement and implication of "effective" viscosity for rhyolite flow emplacement

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Measurement and implication of "effective" viscosity for rhyolite flow emplacement
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, May 2001
DOI 10.1007/s004450100137
Authors

Richard J. Stevenson †, Donald B. Dingwell, Nikolai S. Bagdassarov, Curtis R. Manley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 44 80%
Unspecified 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#385
of 1,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,933
of 39,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.