You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
長時間飛行の疲労評価と対策
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aeromedical Laboratory Reports, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.20846/jasdfaml.57.1_1 |
| Authors |
金澤 富美子, 菊川 あずさ, 金丸 善樹, 髙澤 千智, 大類 伸浩, 丸山 聡, 柳田 保雄, 小林 朝夫, 柏崎 利昌, 藤田 真敬 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Aeromedical Laboratory Reports
#2
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,288
of 324,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aeromedical Laboratory Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them