↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of the Gallbladder Cancer Predictive Risk Score Based on Pathological Findings: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of the Gallbladder Cancer Predictive Risk Score Based on Pathological Findings: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, April 2018
DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6444-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tetsuya Mochizuki, Tomoyuki Abe, Hironobu Amano, Keiji Hanada, Minoru Hattori, Tsuyoshi Kobayashi, Masahiro Nakahara, Hideki Ohdan, Toshio Noriyuki

Abstract

The optimal prognostic predictive system for gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has not been established. The gallbladder cancer predictive risk score (GBRS) based on pathological findings identifies incidental GBC patients at risk of recurrence. We aimed to validate the prognostic ability of the GBRS in all GBC patients following curative surgery. Fifty-six patients with GBC who underwent curative surgery between 1996 and 2016 were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors associated with overall and recurrence-free survival, and propensity score-matched analysis was performed. The median patient age was 71.9 years, and 39.3% of patients were males. All patients underwent curative surgery (33.9%, simple cholecystectomy; 66.1%, more advanced procedures, such as hepatectomy; and 32.1%, bile duct reconstruction). On univariate analysis, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) ≥ 37 U/mL (p = 0.042), postoperative complications (p = 0.043), and a high GBRS (p < 0.001) were prognostic factors for worse overall survival. On multivariate analysis, CA19-9 ≥ 37 U/mL (p = 0.039 and p = 0.043, respectively) and a high GBRS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.010, respectively) were independent risk factors for poor overall and recurrence-free survival. After propensity score-matched analysis, the GBRS precisely predicted prognosis of patients with GBC. The GBRS is an easy and novel prognostic predicting score. Our validation revealed good discrimination, suggesting its clinical utility to improve individualized prediction of survival for patients undergoing resection of GBC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,601,965
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,047
of 6,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,931
of 329,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#97
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.