↓ Skip to main content

A cognitive model of individual well-being

Overview of attention for article published in Social Choice and Welfare, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
A cognitive model of individual well-being
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare, April 2001
DOI 10.1007/s003550100103
Authors

Itzhak Gilboa, David Schmeidler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 45 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 8 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 14%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 20 41%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 10%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Psychology 5 10%
Engineering 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Social Choice and Welfare
#187
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,510
of 43,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Choice and Welfare
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.