↓ Skip to main content

Conformational preferences of the potent dopamine reuptake blocker BTCP and its analogs and their incorporation into a pharmacophore model

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Conformational preferences of the potent dopamine reuptake blocker BTCP and its analogs and their incorporation into a pharmacophore model
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, February 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1008144707255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Froimowitz, Kuo-Ming Wu, Jason Rodrigo, Clifford George

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Materials Science 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#420
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,789
of 111,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.