| Title |
Social Heterogeneity and Community Forestry Processes: Reflections from Forest Users of Dhading District, Nepal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Small-scale Forestry, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11842-010-9136-9 |
| Authors |
Ram Pandit, Eddie Bevilacqua |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Small-scale Forestry
#30
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,325
of 100,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Small-scale Forestry
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.