↓ Skip to main content

Constraints on the upper boundary age of the Tiaojishan Formation volcanic rocks in West Liaoning-North Hebei by LA-ICP-MS dating

Overview of attention for article published in Science Bulletin, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
22 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Constraints on the upper boundary age of the Tiaojishan Formation volcanic rocks in West Liaoning-North Hebei by LA-ICP-MS dating
Published in
Science Bulletin, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11434-008-0287-4
Authors

Hong Zhang, MingXin Wang, XiaoMing Liu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Professor 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,435,148
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Science Bulletin
#331
of 628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,551
of 87,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Bulletin
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.