↓ Skip to main content

Putative Functions and Functional Efficiency of Ordered Cuticular Nanoarrays on Insect Wings

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Journal, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Putative Functions and Functional Efficiency of Ordered Cuticular Nanoarrays on Insect Wings
Published in
Biophysical Journal, January 2008
DOI 10.1529/biophysj.107.109348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory S. Watson, Sverre Myhra, Bronwen W. Cribb, Jolanta A. Watson

Abstract

The putative functions and functional efficiencies of periodic nanostructures on the surface of cicada wings have been investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM) used as a tool for imaging, manipulation, and probing of adhesion. The structures consist of hexagonal close-packed protrusions with a lateral spacing of approximately 200 nm and may have multiple functionalities. Not only do the structures confer survival value by virtue of camouflage, but they may also serve as antiwetting and self-cleaning surfaces and thus be resistant to contamination. These effects have been demonstrated by exposure to white light, liquid droplets, and AFM adhesion measurements. The dependence of optical reflectivity and surface adhesion on surface topography has been demonstrated using AFM as a nanomachining tool as well as an imaging and force-sensing probe. The intact arrays display exceptionally low adhesion for particles in the size range 20 nm-40 microm. The particles can be removed from the array by forces in the range 2-20 nN; conversely, forces in the range 25-230 nN are required to remove identical particles from a flat hydrophilic surface (i.e., polished Si). Measurements of contact angles for several liquids and particle adhesion studies show that the wing represents a low-surface-energy membrane with antiwetting properties. The inference is that a combination of chemistry and structure constitutes a natural technology for conferring resistance to contamination.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 16%
Materials Science 12 15%
Chemistry 10 12%
Physics and Astronomy 9 11%
Engineering 8 10%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Journal
#3,254
of 10,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,490
of 168,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Journal
#17
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.