↓ Skip to main content

Adenosine receptor subtype-selective antagonists in inflammation and hyperalgesia

Overview of attention for article published in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Adenosine receptor subtype-selective antagonists in inflammation and hyperalgesia
Published in
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00210-007-0252-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andras Bilkei-Gorzo, Osama M. Abo-Salem, Alaa M. Hayallah, Kerstin Michel, Christa E. Müller, Andreas Zimmer

Abstract

In this study, we examined the effects of systemic and local administration of the subtype-selective adenosine receptor antagonists PSB-36, PSB-1115, MSX-3, and PSB-10 on inflammation and inflammatory hyperalgesia. Pharmacological blockade of adenosine receptor subtypes after systemic application of antagonists generally led to a decreased edema formation after formalin injection and, with the exception of A(3) receptor antagonism, also after the carrageenan injection. The selective A(2B) receptor antagonist PSB-1115 showed a biphasic, dose-dependent effect in the carrageenan test, increasing edema formation at lower doses and reducing it at a high dose. A(1) and A(2B) antagonists diminished pain-related behaviors in the first phase of the formalin test, while the second, inflammatory phase was attenuated by A(2B) and A(3) antagonists. The A(2B) antagonist was particularly potent in reducing inflammatory pain dose-dependently reaching the maximum effect at a low dose of 3 mg/kg. Inflammatory hyperalgesia was totally eliminated by the A(2A) antagonist MSX-3 at a dose of 10 mg/kg. In contrast to the A(1) antagonist, the selective antagonists of A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) receptors were also active upon local administration. Our results demonstrate that the blockade of adenosine receptor subtypes can decrease the magnitude of inflammatory responses. Selective A(2A) antagonists may be useful for the treatment of inflammatory hyperalgesia, while A(2B) antagonists have potential as analgesic drugs for the treatment of inflammatory pain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Researcher 8 23%
Other 5 14%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#347
of 1,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,907
of 156,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,724 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.