↓ Skip to main content

Surgical Resection Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Propensity Score Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Surgical Resection Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Propensity Score Analysis
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2014
DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-3510-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Po-Hong Liu, Yun-Hsuan Lee, Cheng-Yuan Hsia, Chia-Yang Hsu, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Yi-You Chiou, Han-Chieh Lin, Teh-Ia Huo

Abstract

The long-term survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) who received surgical resection (SR) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains unclear. We compared the efficacy of SR and TACE by using a propensity score analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 73%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,259,845
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,489
of 6,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,873
of 307,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#68
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.