| Title |
Environmental DNA detection of aquatic invasive plants in lab mesocosm and natural field conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-018-1718-z |
| Authors |
Crysta A. Gantz, Mark A. Renshaw, Daniel Erickson, David M. Lodge, Scott P. Egan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 54% |
| Scientists | 10 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,506,241
of 25,205,261 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#359
of 2,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,971
of 335,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#14
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.