↓ Skip to main content

Coevolution with Bacteriophages Drives Genome-Wide Host Evolution and Constrains the Acquisition of Abiotic-Beneficial Mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology and Evolution, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coevolution with Bacteriophages Drives Genome-Wide Host Evolution and Constrains the Acquisition of Abiotic-Beneficial Mutations
Published in
Molecular Biology and Evolution, February 2015
DOI 10.1093/molbev/msv032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauline D. Scanlan, Alex R. Hall, Gordon Blackshields, Ville-P. Friman, Michael R. Davis, Joanna B. Goldberg, Angus Buckling

Abstract

Studies of antagonistic coevolution between hosts and parasites typically focus on resistance and infectivity traits. However, coevolution could also have genome-wide effects on the hosts due to pleiotropy, epistasis or selection for evolvability. Here we investigate these effects in the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 during ~400 generations of evolution in the presence or absence of bacteriophage (coevolution or evolution treatments respectively). Coevolution resulted in variable phage resistance, lower competitive fitness in the absence of phages, and greater genome-wide divergence both from the ancestor and between replicates, in part due to the evolution of increased mutation rates. Hosts from coevolution and evolution treatments had different suites of mutations. A high proportion of mutations observed in coevolved hosts were associated with a known phage target binding site, the Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and correlated with altered LPS length and phage resistance. Mutations in evolved bacteria were correlated with higher fitness in the absence of phages. However, the benefits of these growth-promoting mutations were completely lost when these bacteria were subsequently coevolved with phages, indicating that they were not beneficial in the presence of resistance mutations (consistent with negative epistasis). Our results show that in addition to affecting genome-wide evolution in loci not obviously linked to parasite resistance, coevolution can also constrain the acquisition of mutations beneficial for growth in the abiotic environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Belgium 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 190 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 26%
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 24 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 9%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 30 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,691,638
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#1,476
of 5,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,433
of 369,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#22
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.