↓ Skip to main content

Reevaluation of the Evolutionary Position of Opalinids Based on 18S rDNA,and α- and β-Tubulin Gene Phylogenies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Reevaluation of the Evolutionary Position of Opalinids Based on 18S rDNA,and α- and β-Tubulin Gene Phylogenies
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, May 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00239-004-0149-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akane Nishi, Ken-ichiro Ishida, Hiroshi Endoh

Abstract

Opalinids are enigmatic endosymbiotic protists principally found in the large intestine of anuran amphibians. They are multinucleates and uniformly covered with numerous flagella (or cilia). Their appearance is somewhat similar to that of ciliates, leading to opalinid's initial classification as ciliates, or later as protociliates. However, on the basis of their monomorphic nuclei, absence of a ciliate-like life cycle characterized by conjugation, and an interkinetal fission mode, opalinids were subsequently transferred in the zooflagellates. As several common ultrastructural characteristics shared with proteromonads were elucidated, in particular of the flagellar base, such as their double-stranded flagellar helix, an alliance with proteromonads was widely accepted. Thus, opalinids are currently favored to be placed in the class Opalinea, within the heterokont kingdom Chromista. However, the question of their classification has not been fully resolved, because of a lack of molecular information. Here, we report their phylogenetic position inferred from 18S rDNA, and alpha- and beta-tubulin gene sequences. The 18S rDNA tree gives the opalinids an ancestral position in heterokonts, together with proteromonads, as suggested by the morphological studies. In great contrast, alpha- and beta-tubulin gene analyses suggest an affiliation of opalinids to alveolates, not to heterokonts. However, the AU test implies that opalinids are not closely related with any of other three phyla in the alveolates, suggesting an occupation of an ancestral position within the alveolates. Based on the present molecular information, in particular rDNA phylogeny, and the ultrastructural character of the double helix common to heterokonts, we conclude that opalinids would have a common origin with heterokonts, although analyses based on two tubulin genes do not as yet completely deny a possible placement outside heterokonts. The ambiguity of the evolutionary position shown by the discrepancy between rDNA and tubulin genes phylogenies might reflect an early emergence of opalinids in ancestral chromalveolates, and an extreme specialization during a lengthy history of parasitism, as suggested by a long branch in the rDNA tree.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 28 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 29%
Professor 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 65%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#450
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,351
of 57,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.