↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of leaf-rolling behavior ofCaloptilia serotinella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Insect Behavior, November 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of leaf-rolling behavior ofCaloptilia serotinella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)
Published in
Journal of Insect Behavior, November 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01997131
Authors

T. D. Fitzgerald, K. L. Clark

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Postgraduate 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 73%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,210,174
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Behavior
#120
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,563
of 23,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Behavior
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them