↓ Skip to main content

Two new species of Phanerochaete (Basidiomycota) and redescription of P. robusta

Overview of attention for article published in Mycological Progress, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Two new species of Phanerochaete (Basidiomycota) and redescription of P. robusta
Published in
Mycological Progress, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11557-017-1368-z
Authors

Sheng-Hua Wu, Yu-Ping Chen, Chia-Ling Wei, Dimitrios Floudas, Yu-Cheng Dai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Mycological Progress
#172
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,493
of 442,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycological Progress
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.