↓ Skip to main content

The aesthetes of chitons

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, September 1976
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
The aesthetes of chitons
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, September 1976
DOI 10.1007/bf00399520
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. R. Boyle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 8%
United States 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 42%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 75%
Materials Science 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2009.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#545
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,126
of 4,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.