| Title |
OpenHELP (Heidelberg laparoscopy phantom): development of an open-source surgical evaluation and training tool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-015-4094-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. G. Kenngott, J. J. Wünscher, M. Wagner, A. Preukschas, A. L. Wekerle, P. Neher, S. Suwelack, S. Speidel, F. Nickel, D. Oladokun, L. Maier-Hein, R. Dillmann, H. P. Meinzer, B. P. Müller-Stich |
| Abstract |
Apart from animal testing and clinical trials, surgical research and laparoscopic training mainly rely on phantoms. The aim of this project was to design a phantom with realistic anatomy and haptic characteristics, modular design and easy reproducibility. The phantom was named open-source Heidelberg laparoscopic phantom (OpenHELP) and serves as an open-source platform. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 32% |
| Engineering | 24 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,322,526
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,788
of 6,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,368
of 357,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#46
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.