You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of Standardized Lunar Regolith Simulant Materials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microscopy and Microanalysis, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s143192760606301x |
| Authors |
P Carpenter, L Sibille, S Wilson, G Meeker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 43% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Microscopy and Microanalysis
#179
of 1,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,538
of 64,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microscopy and Microanalysis
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.