| Title |
How to bite the dust: morphology, motion pattern and function of the feeding appendages of the deposit-feeding thalassinid shrimp Callianassa subterranea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, August 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002270050370 |
| Authors |
E. J. Stamhuis, B. Dauwe, J. J. Videler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 54% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2009.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,341
of 3,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,920
of 31,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them