↓ Skip to main content

Classification of mineral water types and comparison with drinking water standards

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Geology, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Classification of mineral water types and comparison with drinking water standards
Published in
Environmental Geology, May 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00254-003-0791-4
Authors

Monique van der Aa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 136 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 18%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 36 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 13%
Environmental Science 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Engineering 7 5%
Other 37 26%
Unknown 38 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geology
#67
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,870
of 50,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them