Title |
A novel mutation in the MFSD8 gene in late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
neurogenetics, October 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10048-008-0153-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
E. Stogmann, S. El Tawil, J. Wagenstaller, A. Gaber, S. Edris, A. Abdelhady, E. Assem-Hilger, F. Leutmezer, S. Bonelli, C. Baumgartner, F. Zimprich, T. M. Strom, A. Zimprich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 2 | 5% |
Ethiopia | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 38 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 19% |
Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 24% |
Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 21% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,937,350
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from neurogenetics
#17
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,229
of 90,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from neurogenetics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them