↓ Skip to main content

Pseudocyst of the Auricle

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, December 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Pseudocyst of the Auricle
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, December 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf03024762
Authors

S. K. Vishwakarma, Deepak Gupta, S. K. Verma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 82%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2012.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
#116
of 838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,530
of 49,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them