↓ Skip to main content

Macromycete fruit bodies as a habitat for dipterans (Insecta, Diptera)

Overview of attention for article published in Entomological Review, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 256)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Macromycete fruit bodies as a habitat for dipterans (Insecta, Diptera)
Published in
Entomological Review, November 2008
DOI 10.1134/s0013873808070038
Authors

N. P. Krivosheina

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 6 15%
Other 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 70%
Environmental Science 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Entomological Review
#31
of 256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,228
of 107,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Entomological Review
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 256 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them