↓ Skip to main content

Xanthine derivatives as antagonists at A1 and A2 adenosine receptors

Overview of attention for article published in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, September 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Xanthine derivatives as antagonists at A1 and A2 adenosine receptors
Published in
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, September 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00572436
Pubmed ID
Authors

U. Schwabe, D. Ukena, M. J. Lohse

Abstract

A variety of alkylxanthines has been comparatively examined as antagonists of A1 adenosine receptors in rat fat cells, rat and bovine cerebral cortex and of A2 adenosine receptors in human platelets. With few exceptions all xanthine derivatives with 7-position substituents such as diprophylline, proxyfylline, pentoxifylline and etofylline were less potent antagonists than xanthine itself which had Ki-values of 170 mumol/l (A1) and 93 mumol/l (A2). Theophylline, caffeine and 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine were more potent than xanthine but nearly equipotent antagonists at both receptor subtypes. 8-Phenyl substituents considerably increased the antagonist potency at A1 and A2 receptors. 1,3-Diethyl-8-phenylxanthine was the most potent A2 antagonist (Ki 0.2 mumol/l) in human platelets. At A1 receptors 1,3-dipropyl-8-(2-amino-4-chlorophenyl)xanthine (PACPX) was the most potent antagonist in all three tissues with Ki-values from 0.3 to 8.6 nmol/l. Several 8-phenylxanthine derivatives were remarkably selective antagonists at A1 receptors. 8-Phenyltheophylline was approximately 700 times more potent as antagonist at A1 receptors (bovine brain) than at A2 receptors (human platelets), and PACPX was even 1,600 times more potent as A1 adenosine receptor antagonist. These compounds offer a possibility for a subtype-selective blockade of adenosine receptors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Student > Master 3 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 85 82%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 85 82%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,896,388
of 23,543,207 outputs
Outputs from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#191
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,104
of 9,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,543,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them