↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian localization microscopy based on intensity distribution of fluorophores

Overview of attention for article published in Protein & Cell, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Bayesian localization microscopy based on intensity distribution of fluorophores
Published in
Protein & Cell, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13238-015-0133-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fan Xu, Mingshu Zhang, Zhiyong Liu, Pingyong Xu, Fa Zhang

Abstract

Super-resolution microscopy techniques have overcome the limit of optical diffraction. Recently, the Bayesian analysis of Bleaching and Blinking data (3B) method has emerged as an important tool to obtain super-resolution fluorescence images. 3B uses the change in information caused by adding or removing fluorophores in the cell to fit the data. When adding a new fluorophore, 3B selects a random initial position, optimizes this position and then determines its reliability. However, the fluorophores are not evenly distributed in the entire image region, and the fluorescence intensity at a given position positively correlates with the probability of observing a fluorophore at this position. In this paper, we present a Bayesian analysis of Bleaching and Blinking microscopy method based on fluorescence intensity distribution (FID3B). We utilize the intensity distribution to select more reliable positions as the initial positions of fluorophores. This approach can improve the reconstruction results and significantly reduce the computational time. We validate the performance of our method using both simulated data and experimental data from cellular structures. The results confirm the effectiveness of our method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Physics and Astronomy 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Engineering 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,804,371
of 25,002,811 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#294
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,535
of 369,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,002,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.