↓ Skip to main content

Morphology of the puparia of the housefly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) and blowfly, Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae)

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Morphology of the puparia of the housefly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) and blowfly, Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae)
Published in
Parasitology Research, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00436-005-1343-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sirisuda Siriwattanarungsee, Kabkaew L. Sukontason, Budsabong Kuntalue, Somsak Piangjai, Jimmy K. Olson, Kom Sukontason

Abstract

Examination of the puparia of the housefly, Musca domestica L. and blowfly Chrysomya megacephala (F.), through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), revealed many differences in the profile of their morphology. Special attention was focused on puparial characteristics used to differentiate between the two fly species studied, and between other forensically important flies. Results of this study indicate that the housefly puparia are almost evenly rounded at both ends and the anterior spiracle bears six papillae. A pair of pupal respiratory horns is found laterally before the posterior boundary of the first abdominal segment, bearing numerous papillae that have a longitudinal opening along the oval convex base. The peritreme of each posterior spiracle forms a crude forward or reverse D-shape, encircling three sinuous slits. The blowfly pupariums anterior spiracle contains 8-12 papillae. The pupal respiratory horns protrude slightly and in some specimens a group of approximately 38 globules on the bubble-like membrane may be observed. Each of the posterior spiracles is more or less an oval- shaped peritreme, encircling three straight spiracular slits. The anatomical features presented herein allow for the differentiation of puparia of the two fly species studied and could prove useful in future forensic entomological assessments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
Portugal 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 68 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 19 24%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 62%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Chemistry 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#621
of 3,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,276
of 57,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.