↓ Skip to main content

Phonemic deficits in developmental dyslexia

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, October 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
412 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Phonemic deficits in developmental dyslexia
Published in
Psychological Research, October 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf00309831
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret J. Snowling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 39%
Neuroscience 16 10%
Linguistics 14 9%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2002.
All research outputs
#8,515,480
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#298
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,895
of 7,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them