| Title |
Computer methods for sampling from gamma, beta, poisson and bionomial distributions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computing, September 1974
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02293108 |
| Authors |
J. H. Ahrens, U. Dieter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 22% |
| Researcher | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 17 | 19% |
| Mathematics | 13 | 14% |
| Engineering | 12 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,135,326
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Computing
#62
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#924
of 4,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them